ArticleCase reports in nephrology2026
Spontaneous Remission of Late Relapsing Membranous Nephropathy After Previous Immunosuppressant-Induced Remission: Case Report.
Article in Case reports in nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spontaneous Remission of Late Relapsing Membranous Nephropathy After Previous Immunosuppressant-Induced Remission: Case Report.Case reports in nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is the first detailed report of spontaneous remission of late relapsing membranous nephropathy (MN) after previous immunosuppressant-induced remission. In March 2004, a 52-year-old Hispanic male presented with severe nephrotic syndrome with proteinuria of 13 g/24 h. The workup for infectious and autoimmune diseases was unrevealing. Renal biopsy showed MN (Stage II). A CT scan showed no malignancy but left pulmonary embolism and left renal vein thrombosis. Anticoagulation was started for asymptomatic thromboembolism. He achieved sustained complete remission of nephrotic syndrome after a prolonged, complicated treatment course of multiple immunosuppressants (corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil for 1 year, followed by alternating monthly corticosteroids and chlorambucil for 6 months, and again corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil for 6 years). Then in July 2021 (now at the age of 69 years), he developed nephrotic syndrome again with proteinuria of 6 g/24 h. Serological work-up was all negative except for the elevated serum Antiphospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody at 42 RU/mL (nl < 14). Renal biopsy in November 2021 showed again MN (Stage III to IV). Immunohistochemistry staining of the biopsy tissue for PLA2R1 antigen was positive. A decision was made to observe him instead of starting immunosuppressants. He was treated with diuretics and Lisinopril. Anti-PLA2R antibody steadily improved to normal range and the nephrotic syndrome gradually improved and finally resolved by August 2023. There was no recurrence of nephrotic syndrome up to the most recent visit in March 2026. A review of the literature shows that a repeat biopsy in patients already known to have MN (especially those PLA2R-mediated cases) with relapse of nephrosis and stable renal function may not be necessary. In routine practice, the watchful waiting strategy for relapse of MN is less often taken as it should be. Therefore, more patients with relapsing MN deserve an observation period before starting immunosuppressants. Hopefully, KDIGO guidelines can include this point for relapsing MN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.