ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Prevalence and risk factors of zoonotic diseases on the human-wildlife-livestock interface in Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces, South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management, socioeconomics, and One Health determinants of tick infestation in communal cattle production systems of South Africa.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases pose a significant threat to food security, rural livelihoods, and public health in Southern Africa, where frequent interactions among humans, livestock, and wildlife facilitate disease spillover. This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of zoonotic diseases among smallholder livestock farmers in the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal provinces of South Africa. Primary data were collected from 155 farmers using a structured questionnaire, and the analysis combined descriptive statistics with a multivariate probit model. The findings revealed notable vulnerabilities. Only 2% of farmers had ever tested their livestock for zoonotic diseases, while 9% reported livestock abortions, a potential indicator of reproductive zoonoses. Risky consumption behaviors were common: 32% of farmers consumed raw milk, 17% raw meat, and 9% raw eggs. Reliance on unsafe water sources was widespread, with 60% depending on rivers and 6% on dams for livestock water. Awareness of zoonotic diseases was very limited, as 44% of respondents could not identify any associated risk factors, and 24% cited restricted access to information. Poor biosecurity practices were reported by 22% of farmers, while 16% had direct contact with wildlife and 19% consumed wildlife products, further elevating exposure risks. The multivariate probit model identified significant predictors of zoonotic risk, including goat ownership, hunting and trapping, raw animal-product consumption, age, gender, and education. Strengthening veterinary surveillance, expanding farmer awareness programmes, and investing in safe water infrastructure are critical to reducing zoonotic transmission at the human-wildlife-livestock interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.