ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Six-month surveillance of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: Susceptibility to fluconazole and anidulafungin was assessed by CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) and gradient diffusion (Etest) methods. Clonal relatedness was evaluated by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) with SNP-based phylogeny and multilocus sequence typing (MLST); azole-associated genes were analyzed in fluconazole non-susceptible isolates. Results: WGS demonstrated a genetically diverse population comprising six clusters, arguing against a single clonal outbreak. The most concerning cluster contained closely related ST11 isolates linked to previously described epidemic ST11 lineages and included both fluconazole-susceptible and non-susceptible isolates; non-susceptibility occurred in only one patient. Non-susceptible isolates carried multiple predominantly heterozygous non-synonymous variants across azole-associated pathways, consistent with an early, genetically heterogeneous stage of resistance development. Marked method-dependent discrepancies were observed for anidulafungin (all susceptible by CLSI BMD, but a substantial fraction non-susceptible by gradient diffusion method), while fluconazole showed higher concordance with minor misclassification. Discussion: Combining WGS with standardized susceptibility testing differentiated increased prevalence from clonal transmission, identified a high-risk ST11 lineage with a complex, likely polygenic resistance architecture, and highlighted limitations of gradient diffusion testing for echinocandin categorization. These findings support molecular surveillance and cautious interpretation of gradient diffusion susceptibility testing results to guide infection control and antifungal stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.