ArticleEcology and evolution2026
PriMath-The Role of Intrinsic Factors in Quantitative Cognitive Performance of Highly Social Primates.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanisms by which animals acquire, process, store, and use information from their environment (i.e., cognitive abilities), like other traits, evolve in response to selection pressures. Individuals with distinct intrinsic traits may benefit to varying degrees from different strategies when solving ecologically relevant cognitive tasks. This effect may be especially pronounced in social species, where group composition can shape the development of different cognitive strategies. In this study, we investigated the quantity discrimination abilities of two highly social New World primates using spontaneous choice tests. Our aim was to explore the effects of species-specific biology and intrinsic traits, such as sex and age, on cognitive performance. We tested 14 focal individuals using five quantity combinations with varying ratios (0.25, 0.5, 0.75): 1 vs. 2, 1 vs. 4, 3 vs. 4, 6 vs. 8, and 6 vs. 12. We found that performance was primarily driven by ratio-dependence rather than absolute differences between quantities. This, combined with the lack of significant differences in response time across quantity combinations, suggests that the Approximate Number System (ANS) is the primary cognitive mechanism underlying quantity discrimination in the studied species. Additionally, response time varied with intrinsic traits such as species, sex, and age; however, we did not detect differences in performance. Our results may reflect the unique social structure of these species, as well as differences in their biology, such as feeding behavior, providing valuable insights into the quantitative abilities of New World monkeys. These findings highlight the need for a deeper exploration of the evolutionary trade-offs and selective pressures shaping the complex interactions among behavior, intrinsic traits, and cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.