Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982373›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Smart ICUs: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Intensive Care Units.

Nikita Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nikita SinghCritical Care Medicine, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming intensive care medicine by enabling advanced analysis of complex clinical data generated in intensive care units (ICUs). This review explores current and emerging applications of AI in ICU practice, including sepsis prediction, mechanical ventilation management, acute kidney injury (AKI) forecasting, haemodynamic monitoring, and prognostication. AI-based models have demonstrated the ability to improve early detection of complications, support clinical decision-making, and optimise resource utilisation. However, challenges such as limited interpretability, data integration constraints, and the need for prospective validation continue to hinder widespread clinical adoption. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted using publications from January 2015 to June 2025. Combinations of the terms "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "intensive care unit", "critical care", "clinical decision support", and "sepsis prediction" were used to search PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on the practical uses or clinical validation of AI tools in ICUs were given precedence, while studies focusing solely on algorithm development without clinical integration were excluded. Sepsis, mechanical ventilation, AKI, haemodynamic monitoring, and prognostication are among the thematic areas of application that organise the review. AI has shown significant utility across ICU domains, including early prediction of complications, forecasting mechanical ventilation duration, risk stratification, haemodynamic instability alerts, and mortality prognostication. Models trained on real-world ICU datasets have demonstrated high predictive accuracy and potential for early intervention. However, challenges such as model interpretability, data fragmentation, and ethical concerns remain.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningintensive care unitmachine learningoutcome

Identifiers

PMID41982373
PMCPMC13072109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.