ReviewCureus2026
Smart ICUs: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Intensive Care Units.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Cardiac ICU: Digital Integration, Predictive Analytics, and Perioperative Inflammation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming Nanomaterials Development with Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming intensive care medicine by enabling advanced analysis of complex clinical data generated in intensive care units (ICUs). This review explores current and emerging applications of AI in ICU practice, including sepsis prediction, mechanical ventilation management, acute kidney injury (AKI) forecasting, haemodynamic monitoring, and prognostication. AI-based models have demonstrated the ability to improve early detection of complications, support clinical decision-making, and optimise resource utilisation. However, challenges such as limited interpretability, data integration constraints, and the need for prospective validation continue to hinder widespread clinical adoption. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted using publications from January 2015 to June 2025. Combinations of the terms "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "intensive care unit", "critical care", "clinical decision support", and "sepsis prediction" were used to search PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on the practical uses or clinical validation of AI tools in ICUs were given precedence, while studies focusing solely on algorithm development without clinical integration were excluded. Sepsis, mechanical ventilation, AKI, haemodynamic monitoring, and prognostication are among the thematic areas of application that organise the review. AI has shown significant utility across ICU domains, including early prediction of complications, forecasting mechanical ventilation duration, risk stratification, haemodynamic instability alerts, and mortality prognostication. Models trained on real-world ICU datasets have demonstrated high predictive accuracy and potential for early intervention. However, challenges such as model interpretability, data fragmentation, and ethical concerns remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.