Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982360›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Perception as self-organizing interaction: embodied cognition, artificial intelligence, and autism.

Gerry Leisman, Raymond Roy, Rahela Alfasi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerry LeismanMovement and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Raymond RoyDepartment of Neuroscience, Neuroscience of Imagination, Cognition, and Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rahela AlfasiMovement and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception has traditionally been conceptualized as the internal reconstruction of external stimuli, both in cognitive science and in artificial intelligence (AI). In this representational view, sensory systems transform input into internal models that guide cognition and action. However, converging evidence from neuroscience, perceptual science, developmental psychology, autism research, robotics, and contemporary AI increasingly challenges this assumption. Across these domains, perception appears to emerge through active, embodied engagement with the environment rather than through passive signal processing or static internal representation. Embodied cognition theories propose that perceptual meaning arises from lawful relations among bodily constraints, action, temporal coordination, and environmental feedback, emphasizing perception as an ongoing process of interaction. In parallel, recent advances in AI have shifted away from purely feedforward or data-driven perceptual architectures toward closed-loop, predictive, and self-organizing systems in which perception and action are inseparable components of adaptive behavior. Approaches such as embodied reinforcement learning, active inference, and world-model-based learning increasingly treat perception as emerging through sensorimotor interaction and temporally structured regulation rather than inference alone. This theoretical paper integrates embodied cognition with contemporary AI-driven models of perception, arguing that embodiment functions as a generative constraint enabling robust, context-sensitive, and developmentally grounded sensory cognition across biological and artificial systems. We further extend this framework to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), proposing that many sensory-perceptual differences in autism can be understood as variations in embodied self-organization, predictive regulation, and temporal coordination rather than as deficits in abstract cognition. Finally, we discuss how embodied AI systems can serve as formal testbeds for exploring autism-relevant perceptual mechanisms and for designing adaptive, interaction-based technologies that support perceptual coherence without imposing normative behavioral models.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorder (ASD)embodied artificial intelligenceembodied cognitionpredictive processingself-organizing perceptionsensorimotor integration

Identifiers

PMID41982360
PMCPMC13070933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.