ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Perception as self-organizing interaction: embodied cognition, artificial intelligence, and autism.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ISEED: an always-on cognitive architecture for experience-driven interaction-oriented humanoid robots.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perception has traditionally been conceptualized as the internal reconstruction of external stimuli, both in cognitive science and in artificial intelligence (AI). In this representational view, sensory systems transform input into internal models that guide cognition and action. However, converging evidence from neuroscience, perceptual science, developmental psychology, autism research, robotics, and contemporary AI increasingly challenges this assumption. Across these domains, perception appears to emerge through active, embodied engagement with the environment rather than through passive signal processing or static internal representation. Embodied cognition theories propose that perceptual meaning arises from lawful relations among bodily constraints, action, temporal coordination, and environmental feedback, emphasizing perception as an ongoing process of interaction. In parallel, recent advances in AI have shifted away from purely feedforward or data-driven perceptual architectures toward closed-loop, predictive, and self-organizing systems in which perception and action are inseparable components of adaptive behavior. Approaches such as embodied reinforcement learning, active inference, and world-model-based learning increasingly treat perception as emerging through sensorimotor interaction and temporally structured regulation rather than inference alone. This theoretical paper integrates embodied cognition with contemporary AI-driven models of perception, arguing that embodiment functions as a generative constraint enabling robust, context-sensitive, and developmentally grounded sensory cognition across biological and artificial systems. We further extend this framework to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), proposing that many sensory-perceptual differences in autism can be understood as variations in embodied self-organization, predictive regulation, and temporal coordination rather than as deficits in abstract cognition. Finally, we discuss how embodied AI systems can serve as formal testbeds for exploring autism-relevant perceptual mechanisms and for designing adaptive, interaction-based technologies that support perceptual coherence without imposing normative behavioral models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.