ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The effects of prediction errors and movement speed on pseudo-haptic sensations.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudo-haptic sensations are illusory haptic experiences induced by manipulating the visual feedback of object movements. Previous studies have suggested that such sensations arise from prediction errors generated by a forward model, defined as the discrepancy between predicted and actual outcomes. In contrast, other studies propose that pseudo-haptic sensations emerge from a simple statistical relationship between weight and movement speed (e.g., heavier objects move more slowly), with prediction errors being only a by-product. In the present study, we further investigated the mechanisms underlying pseudo-haptic sensations by separating spatial prediction errors from movement speed. Participants moved a cursor along a sine-wave-shaped pathway using a mouse. The cursor's movement direction was generated by combining participants' real-time mouse movements with pre-recorded movements from another individual, producing three levels of control. The cursor's movement speed remained proportional to the mouse movement. On the other hand, when the cursor entered a central painted zone on the screen, its speed was reduced by three different ratios while remaining proportional to the mouse movement. Participants rated their sense of resistance in the hand and their sense of agency over the cursor's movement. A linear mixed-effects model analysis, with spatial prediction error and the time required to reach the end of the pathway as fixed effects and participant as a random effect, showed that both spatial prediction error and effective movement speed (indexed by trial completion time) significantly contributed to the sense of resistance. Taken together, these findings suggest that both prediction errors and object movement speed contribute to pseudo-haptic sensations, likely through different processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.