ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Finite element analysis-based optimization of longitudinal bending stiffness and rearfoot stability in carbon-plated running shoes.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The carbon-plated midsole in running shoes plays a pivotal role in enhancing the runner's performance by storing and releasing energy. A key factor in running shoes is the Longitudinal Bending Stiffness (LBS), where higher LBS usually improves energy efficiency by enhancing energy return during a running cycle. However, a critical trade-off exists: excessive LBS can diminish performance and may increase the risk of injury. Methods: To this end, this study aims to model and optimize the balance between energy efficiency and stability through finite element analysis (FEA). Specifically, the LBS was systematically adjusted by varying midsole foam materials and carbon plate thicknesses. A total of two FEA models were employed: a three-point bending simulation accessing LBS, and a lateral loading model accessing rearfoot stability. Boundary conditions for both models were defined through preliminary simulations. A parametric analysis was conducted by varying the midsole foam material and carbon plate thickness to identify optimal configurations. Results: Preliminary results indicate that EVA midsoles exhibited the greatest LBS and stability, followed by PEBA, both outperforming TPU. Furthermore, thicker carbon plates showed a higher value of LBS but had little effect on stability. Discussion: This research provides a novel standard of LBS testing and a novel FEA modeling framework for designing carbon-plated running shoes that enhance performance while reducing injury risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.