ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
ConsultCraft: Reimagining Perioperative Education With AI-Based Adaptive Case Discussions.
Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The American Medical Association's vision of precision education requires personalized, scalable learning tools. Current medical education approaches lack systems that integrate data analytics with efficient content delivery. Large language models (LLMs) are a promising approach but risk propagating misinformation without expert oversight. Methods: We developed ConsultCraft, a web-based perioperative case discussion application using the GPT-4o application program interface to reference cases developed using Claude 3.5 Sonnet with expert revision of the case narrative and learning points. Users engaged in simulated clinical case discussions designed to enhance critical thinking skills in clinical decision making. They could choose between immediate feedback (tutor mode) or deferred feedback (immersion mode). We analyzed transcripts over a 4-week period for question progression and feedback accuracy, including inferences, false credit given, and false knowledge gaps implied. Results: We analyzed 49 sessions across 9 cases with 80% in tutor mode. The LLM asked users 306 questions and generated 236 feedback responses. Analysis revealed a low rate of potentially misleading inferences (2.1%) with false credit given in 4.2% of feedback responses and false knowledge gaps implied in 9.7%. Conclusions: ConsultCraft successfully combines LLM language processing capabilities with expert content to create personalized case discussions that minimize the potential for propagating misleading information. Future directions include content mapping to certification requirements and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes and integration with assessment and scheduling data to target gaps in knowledge and experience. This approach demonstrates how educators can leverage augmented intelligence to create tailored educational tools that preserve expert guidance while achieving the accessibility and adaptability required for precision education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.