ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Deep learning-based auto-segmentation and RECIST evaluation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and intrahepatic progression after following treatment is common. Accurate tumor evaluation is essential for treatment decisions but remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity, the background of cirrhotic liver, and treatment-related artifacts. This study investigated the feasibility of a deep learning-based auto-segmentation approach for response evaluation in locally advanced HCC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced HCC who underwent definitive CCRT between 2016 and 2021. Tumor contours were manually delineated on pre-treatment (CTpre) and first post-treatment CT (CTpost). A fully convolutional DenseNet (FCD) and an intentional deep overfit learning (IDOL) framework were trained and validated. Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and RECIST-based diameters were compared between manual and predicted contours. Results: In the full cohort, the FCD model achieved mean DSCs of 0.53 for CTpre and 0.33 for CTpost, while the IDOL model improved CTpost DSCs to 0.49. In the RECIST cohort ( Conclusions: The patient-specific IDOL framework improved auto-segmentation accuracy compared with conventional models and provided reliable data for RECIST-based response assessment. Despite limitations and lack of external validation, this study demonstrates the preliminary feasibility of auto-segmentation to support response evaluation in treated HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.