ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
BRCA mutation status and olaparib-related toxicity during maintenance therapy: a real-world retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Olaparib is a standard maintenance therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly in patients with BRCA mutations. While BRCA status is an established predictive biomarker for efficacy, its potential impact on treatment-related toxicity remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between BRCA mutation status and the incidence and severity of olaparib-related adverse events in a real-world cohort. Method: This retrospective observational study included patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who received olaparib maintenance therapy at Shandong Provincial Hospital between August 2018 and October 2021. Patients were stratified by BRCA mutation status. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and analyzed at the patient level. Clinically relevant adverse events were defined as grade ≥2, as these typically require medical intervention, closer monitoring, or dose modification. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: A total of 40 patients were included (24 BRCA-mutant and 16 BRCA wild-type). Clinically relevant adverse events (grade ≥2) occurred more frequently in the BRCA-mutant group than in the BRCA wild-type group (62.5% vs. 18.8%; OR 7.22, 95% CI 1.65-27.42; p = 0.0097). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and prior chemotherapy cycles, BRCA mutation status remained significantly associated with grade ≥2 adverse events (OR 8.66, 95% CI 1.67-44.81; p = 0.010). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was uncommon in both groups. Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective cohort, BRCA mutation status was associated with increased risk of clinically significant olaparib-related toxicity. These findings suggest that BRCA mutation status may help identify patients at higher risk of adverse events and support closer toxicity monitoring and individualized dose management during maintenance therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.