ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
Bridging Clinical Trials to Real-World Clinical Practice: TCHP Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is standard for HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC). The TCHP regimen (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, pertuzumab) demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials; however, real-world evidence remains limited. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of TCHP in routine clinical practice at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC). Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 161 patients with HER2+ BC who received at least one cycle of TCHP between January 2022 and October 2024. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary endpoints included safety, emergency room (ER) visits, and hospitalization rates. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of pCR, reporting odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The cohort included 160 females and one male, with a median age of 51 years (24-80). Most patients were ER/PR-positive (73.9%), and 26.1% were ER/PR-negative. Tumors were predominantly high-grade (grade 3 in 106 patients), with nodal involvement in 95 patients. Surgical resection was performed in 143 patients. pCR was achieved in 45.5% of patients. HER2 IHC 3+ expression (adjusted OR 11.76; 95% CI 3.69-54.00; p<0.001) and ER/PR-negative status (adjusted OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.09-6.50; p=0.035) were independent predictors of pCR, while tumor stage and nodal status, were not. No cardiac toxicity or ejection fraction decline was observed. Anti-HER2 therapy was discontinued in six patients, and 11 did not complete six cycles. Chemotherapy dose reductions occurred in 38 patients, mainly due to hematologic toxicity. A median of three ER visits per patient was recorded, with hospitalization required in 42 patients, primarily for neutropenic fever and diarrhea. Conclusion: In this real‑world cohort, TCHP achieved a moderate pCR rate (45.5%), lower than clinical trial reports, with HER2 IHC 3+ and ER/PR‑negative status predicting response, but substantial toxicity-including frequent emergency visits and hospitalization, highlighting the need for improved patient selection, strengthened supportive care, and consideration of de‑escalation strategies to maintain efficacy while reducing morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.