ArticleGlobal health action2026
Evaluating a sexual and reproductive health and rights programme within Swedish for Immigrants education: a study protocol.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are central to health equity, yet migrants in Sweden, especially from low-income countries, experience linguistic, cultural, and structural barriers to SRHR information and services. Although migrants are prioritised in Sweden's national strategy for SRHR, no evaluation has examined SRHR education embedded within language programmes, limiting culturally responsive and scalable interventions. This protocol describes a study evaluating an SRHR programme integrated into Swedish for Immigrants (SFI), the national language programme for newly arrived adults.The study explores implementation processes, experiences of participants and implementers, and changes in SRHR knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, and healthcare navigation. Guided by implementation research principles and the UK Medical Research Council process evaluation framework, four qualitative sub-studies will be conducted across participating SFI sites. Semi-structured interviews and ethnographic fieldwork will involve midwives, SFI teachers, municipal stakeholders, and adult migrant learners. Data will be analysed using a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis and an ethnographic - hermeneutic approach, with process evaluation examining fidelity, adaptations, mechanisms of impact, and contextual determinants.The study is expected to identify key facilitators and barriers influencing programme delivery, acceptability, and relevance. Findings will inform evidence-based recommendations to strengthen cultural adaptation, implementation strategies, and learner engagement. Anticipated impacts include improved individual SRHR knowledge and health literacy, enhanced institutional capacity for inclusive SRHR promotion, and more equitable public service delivery at the societal level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.