Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982080›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2026

How do US Adults Who Vape Choose Among Different E-Cigarette (EC) Models and Cigarettes in Response to Prices and Taxes.

Shaoying Ma, Sooa Ahn, Hojin Park, Qian Yang, John F P Bridges, Ce Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaoying MaCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-0622
Sooa AhnCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hojin ParkDepartment of Economics, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.
Qian YangCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
John F P BridgesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ce ShangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

The impact of ENDS tax policies on the consumption of ENDS and cigarettesR21CA249757 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHANG, CE · 2021 to 2021
$401k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA249757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

States continue to impose E-Cigarette (EC) taxes without clear evidence of the cross-price elasticities between multiple EC types and between ECs and cigarettes. Moreover, existing literature focused on EC sales or prevalence outcomes instead of consumption units of various EC types. We examined how EC and cigarette consumption respond to prices and taxes and estimated own-price and cross-price elasticities for multiple EC types using a nationally representative volumetric choice experiment (VCE) of US adults who vaped ECs in the past 30 days. In the VCE, participants made purchases for monthly consumption in response to changing tax and price levels in 9 choice sets, and 700 people were recruited and answered VCE questions during 2023. Each choice set includes disposables, pod devices, pod refill packs, pod starter kits, tank devices, e-liquids, and cigarettes. Zero-inflated Poisson model was used to estimate price and tax impacts, as well as own- and cross-price elasticities of demand for these products. Increasing taxes and prices (e.g., minimum pricing floor) reduces EC consumption among US adults who vape, and different EC types are economic substitutes. Platform goods (e.g., tank devices and e-liquids, pod devices and refill packs) are economic complements. Increasing EC prices likely does not lead to higher cigarette consumption among the general adult EC-using population. The design of EC taxes by EC models and components may be needed given their complex economic relationships.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCommerceElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTaxesTobacco ProductsVapingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Statescigarettescross‐price elasticitiese‐cigarettesexcise taxesown‐price elasticitiespricestaxes

Identifiers

PMID41982080
PMCPMC13674979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.