ArticleScandinavian journal of psychology2026
Swedish Clinicians' Knowledge, Practices, and Access to Structured Guidance Regarding Maladaptive Exercise in Eating Disorders.
Article in Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maladaptive exercise is a common and serious symptom in eating disorders (EDs), yet often poorly addressed in treatment. This study examined clinicians' knowledge, practices, and access to structured guidance such as clinic-level practices/informal protocols related to maladaptive exercise, and whether these varied by profession, experience, or personal exercise habits. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 102 clinicians working in Swedish ED care. The survey assessed self-reported knowledge, clinical practices, and access to clinic-level practices/informal protocols. Differences by profession, years of ED work experience, and personal physical activity were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Spearman correlations. Most clinicians viewed maladaptive exercise as an aggravating symptom but reported limited formal training and moderate confidence in managing it. Assessment was common, but structured interventions were rare and opinions about them varied by profession. Only 42% reported access to clinic-level practices/informal protocols, while 84% expressed a need for national guidance. Despite recognizing maladaptive exercise as clinically significant, ED clinicians report limited training and inconsistent guidance. Profession-specific differences and the strong demand for national guidelines underscore the need for structured, evidence-based approaches to both the assessment and treatment of maladaptive exercise, as well as adequate training for clinicians in their application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.