ArticleTransfusion2026
Geographic variation in blood transfusion among TRICARE beneficiaries.
Article in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood is a critical but inconsistently distributed resource. Within the United States, there are known state-level variations in blood product distribution; however, little is known about geographic variations in transfusion practices on a national level. The US Military Health System offers an opportunity to study a nationally representative population through the TRICARE insurance claims database. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsClaims from beneficiaries with acute bleeding diagnoses (related to trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, or gastrointestinal bleeding) from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine relationships between geographic characteristics (hospital region and rurality) and transfusion status.
resultsThe study population consisted of 87,034 admissions. In adjusted models, rural trauma patients were significantly less likely to be transfused than urban trauma patients (aOR 0.18, 0.03-0.55). Conversely, rural postpartum hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding patients were more likely to be transfused than their urban counterparts (aOR 1.63, 1.32-2.00 and aOR 1.24, 1.11-1.37, respectively). Hospital region was significantly associated with transfusion status among the postpartum hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding cohorts, with patients in the Midwest less likely to receive a transfusion than patients in the Northeast (aOR 0.33, 0.24-0.45 and aOR 0.60, 0.52-0.70, respectively). DISCUSSION: In this sample, geographic factors including hospital region and rurality were independently associated with transfusion status among inpatients with acute bleeding diagnoses. These variations may reflect provider- or system-level factors and can help identify areas of potential vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.