ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
A global ranking of the relative vulnerability of marine mammals to macroplastic pollution.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A global ranking of the relative vulnerability of marine mammals to macroplastic pollution.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastic pollution poses a threat to marine mammals across the globe. However, quantitative research on the impacts of plastic pollution in marine mammals is lacking because of the ethical and practical issues that prevent experimentation on these species and the opportunistic nature of observational studies. Trait-based vulnerability indices offer a way to estimate the relative vulnerability of marine species to environmental stressors based on available knowledge about species life-history traits. To develop a relative global vulnerability index to macroplastic pollution for marine mammals (117 species), we applied an existing framework for assessing species vulnerability to macroplastic based on three components of vulnerability-likelihood of exposure, species sensitivity, and population resilience. We identified 11 traits to assess marine mammal species' likelihood of exposure (three traits), sensitivity (four traits), and population resilience to macroplastics (four traits). Using species trait data, we assigned each species a score for each trait. Weighting all three components of vulnerability equally, these scores were summed to provide each species a relative vulnerability score. On average, sirenians were most vulnerable to macroplastic interactions, whereas pinnipeds and fissipeds were least vulnerable, though within-order variation in vulnerability occurred. Through the global application of this vulnerability framework, we highlight its value for informing research and management needs to better reduce the impacts of macroplastic pollution on marine mammals and marine species more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.