ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2026
Messenger RNA and guide RNA distributions in lipid nanoparticles impact gene-editing efficiency in vivo.
Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivering the future of immunotherapy: A state-of-the-art review of gene editing in immune cells with lipid nanoparticles.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Trivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine Induces Robust Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Mice: Preclinical Evaluation for Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are among the most advanced non-viral vectors for CRISPR-based gene-editing therapeutics. Co-packaging of messenger RNA (mRNA) and guide RNA (gRNA) inherently produces heterogeneous payload distributions. The impact of this heterogeneity on editing performance remains unclear. Here, we utilize cylindrical illumination confocal spectroscopy (CICS) for single-particle interrogation of ALC-0315 and DLin-MC3-DMA LNPs prepared by three different mixing methods. CICS resolves four distinct subpopulations: co-encapsulated (50.7%-60.4%), gRNA only (30.0%-36.5%), mRNA only (2.0%-3.4%), and empty (4.2%-13.8%), and it uncovers broad, particle-to-particle variability in RNA copy number within each class. Structure-function analysis reveals that LNP formulation and mixing processes influence payload distribution, resulting in a negative correlation between the fraction of empty LNPs and RNA loading per particle. We further investigated the correlation between these quality attributes and therapeutic performance. In mice, ALC-0315 LNPs carrying higher cargo loads (9.8 vs. 8.0 mRNA copies and 25.4 vs. 20.3 gRNA copies per co-encapsulated particle) yielded 1.5-fold higher in vivo editing activity (55.4% vs. 36.3% insertions and deletions [indels]) despite nearly identical biophysical characteristics including LNP size and RNA encapsulation. These results establish payload distribution as a potential determinant of gene-editing potency and demonstrate single-particle CICS as a powerful tool for rational design of multi-component nucleic acid-delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.