ArticleCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2026
Repeated Use of Emergency Departments for Nontraumatic Dental Conditions: Factors Associated With Being a Superutilizer.
Article in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to inadequate access to regular, affordable dental care, many patients turn to emergency departments (EDs) for the treatment of nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs). NTDC ED visits are a large burden on the U.S. healthcare system, with over 1.3 million visits each year and over $1 billion in associated charges. This study examines the characteristics of ED visitors and superutilizers (4+ ED visits in a calendar year) for non-dental (general) and dental reasons; investigates the cost of care for ED visitors and superutilizers; and estimates associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of superutilization.
methodsData obtained from the State Emergency Department Databases was used to summarise trends in visits by general and dental ED visitors and superutilizers, including visit rates and costs, across 14 states and 5 years. Logistic regression models were developed to estimate the likelihood of being dental superutilizers and superutilizers (for dental and non-dental visits) based on the characteristics of their first ED visit (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income quartile, insurance type, presence of comorbidities and state in which ED visit occurred).
resultsOf the total number of ED visitors (N = 25 905 031), the majority (92.4%) were general (non-dental) visitors; 6.4% were general superutilizers; 1.2% were dental visitors; and less than 1% (n = 2617) were dental superutilizers; dental superutilizers made up 0.2% of all superutilizers. Individuals who sought ED care for dental or non-dental reasons four or more times in a year were more likely to be white, be in the second or third quartile in terms of income, and have insurance coverage through Medicaid, other dental insurance, or to be uninsured. Finally, mean and median treatment costs for general and dental superutilizers were considerably higher than for both general and dental visitors to the ED. DISCUSSION: Individuals seeking ED care for NTDCs four or more times in a year are more likely to be white, have insurance coverage through Medicaid, Medicare or to be uninsured, and have one or more medical comorbidities. Cost of care for superutilizers is also considerably higher than for other ED visitors. Expansion of dental services for adults, particularly those on Medicaid, is needed to ensure they can access timely preventative and restorative services and avoid the burden of dental crisis requiring a visit to the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.