Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981812›Full record

SynthesisInternational endodontic journal2026

Effect of Oral Corticosteroid Premedication on the Success of Anaesthetising Mandibular Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Nandini Suresh, Monika Arulalan, Geethanjali Ravindra Raj, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Sheela B Abraham, Sajesh K Veettil, Thiago César da Silva Lima, Juliana Vilela Bastos, Shaju Jacob Pulikkotil, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nandini SureshFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (MAHER), Chennai, TamilNadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-1403
Monika ArulalanFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (MAHER), Chennai, TamilNadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0103-1024
Geethanjali Ravindra RajFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (MAHER), Chennai, TamilNadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-4524
Velmurugan NatanasabapathyFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (MAHER), Chennai, TamilNadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-6837
Sheela B AbrahamDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-8625
Sajesh K VeettilDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Thiago César da Silva LimaRestorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-0288
Juliana Vilela BastosRestorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-2566
Shaju Jacob PulikkotilProf. Shaju Jacob Pulikkotil Group, Oral Health Research, School of Dentistry, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Venkateshbabu NagendrababuDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-3156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of oral corticosteroid premedication to achieve profound mandibular anaesthesia in teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.

methodsAn electronic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of oral corticosteroid premedication on the success of mandibular anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. The search was performed without date restrictions and limited to trials in English. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary meta-analysis was conducted by including all the trials whilst sensitivity analyses were conducted only on trials with a low risk of bias. Sub-group analyses were performed to assess the dose-response effect. A TSA was performed to evaluate the risks of random errors in the meta-analysis. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

resultsA total of 8 trials were included in the review. The primary meta-analysis demonstrated that oral premedication with dexamethasone significantly increased the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) compared with a placebo (RR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.35-2.41). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a similar result compared to the primary analysis. The sub-group analysis suggested that doses of both 0.5 mg and 4 mg were effective. Oral premedication with dexamethasone had the same effect on IANB success rates when compared to NSAIDs. The TSA confirmed that the evidence for a beneficial effect of oral dexamethasone premedication when compared to placebo for enhancing the anaesthetic efficacy of IANB in teeth with irreversible pulpitis was conclusive. The GRADE was rated as 'moderate' and 'high' when oral corticosteroids were compared with placebo and NSAID, respectively.

conclusionOral corticosteroid premedication improves the efficacy of IANB compared to placebo and has a similar effect when compared to NSAIDs in mandibular teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42024508463).

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAnesthesia, DentalPremedicationPulpitisAdministration, OralHumansMandibleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex Hormonescorticosteroidirreversible pulpitismeta‐analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41981812
PMCPMC13462409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.