ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Molecular fingerprints are strong models for peptide function prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-aware artificial intelligence for next-generation drug discovery: from protein-ligand modeling to generative biomolecular design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Scaling SMILES-based chemical language models for therapeutic peptide engineering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sequence-Derived and Molecular Descriptors for Interpretable Modeling of Molecular Systems: Insights from Peptide Hemolysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Predicting enzymatic cleavage sites in cyclic peptides with non-canonical amino acids using a Graphormer model trained on MetID user data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Best practices to cluster large molecular libraries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- How to build machine learning models able to extrapolate from standard to modified peptides.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationUnderstanding peptide properties is often assumed to require modeling long-range molecular interactions, motivating complex graph neural networks and pretrained transformers. Whether such long-range dependencies are essential remains unclear. We investigate if simple, domain-specific molecular fingerprints can capture peptide function without these assumptions. Atomic-level representations aim to provide richer information than purely sequence-based models and better efficiency than structural ones.
resultsAcross 132 datasets, including LRGB and five additional peptide benchmarks, models using count-based ECFP, Topological Torsion, and RDKit fingerprints with LightGBM achieve state-of-the-art accuracy. Despite encoding only short-range molecular features, these models outperform GNNs and transformer-based approaches. Control experiments confirm that fingerprints, though inherently local, suffice for robust peptide property prediction. Our results challenge the presumed necessity of long-range interaction modeling and highlight molecular fingerprints as efficient, interpretable, and lightweight alternatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All code and data are available on GitHub and Zenodo: https://github.com/scikit-fingerprints/peptides_molecular_fingerprints_classification https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19388783.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.