ArticleBMC psychology2026
Emotional resilience and affective forecasting bias in junior high school students: the moderating role of negative coping.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals' affective forecasts often systematically differ from their actual affective experiences, a phenomenon formally termed affective forecasting bias. This bias may compound academic stress and undermine long-term psychological adjustment, necessitating heightened attention.
methodsIn Study 1, we examined 248 ninth-grade students in a real examination scenario in 2025 to validate the existence of affective forecasting bias. In Study 2, participants from Study 1 were selected based on the top and bottom 27% of emotional resilience scores, while their negative coping styles were simultaneously measured to investigate the impact of emotional resilience on affective forecasting bias and the moderating role of negative coping styles.
resultsJunior high school students demonstrated significant affective forecasting bias. Emotional resilience significantly influenced affective forecasting bias, with individuals exhibiting higher emotional resilience showing smaller affective forecasting bias. Negative coping styles negatively moderated the effect of emotional resilience on affective forecasting bias.
conclusionsJunior high school students exhibit affective forecasting bias, which is influenced by emotional resilience, and this influence is moderated by negative coping styles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.