ArticleBMC psychology2026
The mediating role of job and life satisfaction in the effect of psychological resilience on employee performance: evidence from the February 6 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating roles of job satisfaction (JS) and life satisfaction (LS) in the relationship between psychological resilience (PR) and employee performance (EP). Data for this study, which employed quantitative research methods, were collected using a survey technique. Research data were collected from social service workers in provinces affected by the February 6 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. SPSS and Smart PLS software were used to test the hypotheses. Upon examining the results obtained from direct hypothesis tests, it was found that PR had a significant and positive impact on EP, JS, and LS. Additionally, it was found that JS had a significant impact on EP, whereas LS did not have a significant effect on EP. When examining the mediating hypothesis tests, it was determined that JS played a mediating role in the relationship between PR and EP. In contrast, LS did not mediate this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.