Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981679›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Lineage-specific evolution, structural diversity, and activity of R2 retrotransposons in animals.

Nozhat T Hassan, Briana Van Treeck, Anthony Rodríguez-Vargas, Anna E Sheppard, Kathleen Collins, David L Adelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. DNA-bound avian R2 non-LTR retrotransposon protein recruits a second R2 protein for genome-protective second-strand nicking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nozhat T HassanSchool of Biological Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Briana Van TreeckDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Anthony Rodríguez-VargasDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Anna E SheppardSchool of Biological Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Kathleen CollinsDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. kcollins@berkeley.edu.
David L AdelsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia. david.adelson@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

Human genetic supplementation without donor DNA or a DNA breakDP1HL156819 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN · 2020 to 2024
$5.8M
Towards Genome Engineering: Principles of precision in RNA-binding and cDNA-synthesis for a site-specifically targeted non-LTR retroelementF32GM139306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI VAN TREECK, BRIANA NICOLE · 2021 to 2022
$136k
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine EDUC4-1279NIH HHS DP1 HL156819NIH HHS F32 GM139306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrotransposons play outsized roles in the evolution of gene regulation, genome function, and disease pathogenesis, and more recently they have sparked interest as instruments for new gene therapy approaches. R2 retrotransposons insert site-specifically into the multicopy genes encoding 28S ribosomal RNA at a target sequence conserved broadly across eukaryotic evolution. R2 retrotransposons have been detected in many animals, but previous surveys have been limited in scope and methodology.

resultsHere, we substantially expand the known distribution of R2 retrotransposons from previously unrepresented or underrepresented taxonomic groups, ranging from ctenophores to amphibians and reptiles. We discover diverse R2 domain architectures and motifs and identify many new avian R2 candidates for genome engineering development. Overall, phylogenetic analyses reveal two highly successful R2 lineages. We describe lineage-distinctive features of the N-terminal DNA recognition domains and reverse-transcriptase domain signatures. Within a lineage, R2 protein sequences do not necessarily preserve the unifying configuration of N-terminal domains assumed in the current clade classification scheme. We show that recombinant R2 proteins with distinctive domain architectures and distribution across major animal classes support target-primed reverse transcription with conserved site specificity.

conclusionsOur analysis of the surprisingly varied domain architectures that support target-site specificity informs new R2 classification criteria and provides a greatly expanded foundation for additional structure/function insights about DNA binding selectivity. This expanded perspective on R2 evolution informs approaches for engineering therapeutic gene insertion technologies and offers an opportunity to investigate the conservation and diversification of retrotransposons.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRetroelementsAmino Acid SequenceAmphibiansAnimalsPhylogenyProtein DomainsReptilesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID41981679
PMCPMC13188248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.