Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981655›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Medication adherence in pet bird owners: index development and assessment of various application types via an online questionnaire.

Felica Fontaine, Katrin Drasch, Anne-Kathrin Burmeister, Sebastian Prechsl, Christoph Müller, Rüdiger Korbel, Monika Rinder, Nicole J Saam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felica FontaineClinic for Birds, Small Mammals, Reptiles and Ornamental Fish, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Katrin DraschInstitute of Sociology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Anne-Kathrin BurmeisterClinic for Birds, Small Mammals, Reptiles and Ornamental Fish, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Sebastian PrechslInstitute of Sociology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christoph MüllerInstitute of Sociology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Rüdiger KorbelClinic for Birds, Small Mammals, Reptiles and Ornamental Fish, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Monika RinderClinic for Birds, Small Mammals, Reptiles and Ornamental Fish, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oberschleißheim, Germany. monika.rinder@lmu.de.
Nicole J SaamInstitute of Sociology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to medication prescriptions substantially contributes to therapeutic success. In pet bird medicine, however, measures to determine adherence and possible causes are lacking. This study aimed to develop medication adherence indices for companion bird owners, including single and multiple application types.

resultsThe single veterinary medication adherence index (SVMAI-4), a 4-point index developed for individual treatment types, considers changes in treatment type, dosage or treatment time, early discontinuation, and total refusal for 9 application types. The overall adherence index OVMAI-5, a 5-point index addresses multiple application types and also considers nonprescribed medication. An online questionnaire was developed to evaluate the indices and measure determinants of adherence based on self-reports and implemented in a cross-sectional survey of 1480 bird owners. The results revealed that oral application directly into the beak (62.5% of birds) and by drinking water (28.3%) were the most common application types. Distinct differences among application types were found. With a range of 0 (full adherence) to 4 (full nonadherence), adherence was highest for cutaneous application (mean = 0.36, standard deviation (SD) = 0.736) and lowest for peroral application into the beak (mean 0.59; SD = 1.023) and injection (mean 0.73, SD = 1.126). The OVMAI-5 calculated when assessing the use of multiple application types resulted in a mean score of 0.84 (SD = 1.247), ranging from 0 to 5.

conclusionsThe results suggest a need for action regarding the application types most commonly used in avian medicine. Wherever possible, oral administration via the beak should be avoided. Due to the self-reporting method used, it must be assumed that our results overestimate adherence and cannot be externally evaluated in a straightforward way. Animal patient-related factors are the most important determinants of medication adherence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPetsVeterinary DrugsAnimalsBirdsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVeterinary DrugsAdherence indexAvian medicineBird ownerComplianceMedication adherenceVeterinary practice

Identifiers

PMID41981655
PMCPMC13085360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.