ArticleBMC psychology2026
Autonomy-supportive teaching, positive academic emotions, and agentic engagement in EFL contexts.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth Mindset and Self-Perceived Adaptive Intelligence: A Structural Model of Motivation, Metacognition, Self-Regulated Learning, and Academic Adaptation.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- How teacher support, peer connection, and embodied meaning-making interact in drama-based social-emotional learning in higher education.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Beyond teacher burnout: teacher emotional regulation mechanisms underlying learner engagement in English classrooms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agentic engagement, defined as students’ proactive and constructive contributions to shaping their own learning processes, has been increasingly recognized as an important yet underexplored dimension of engagement. Drawing on an integrated motivational–affective framework informed by Self-Determination Theory and Control-Value Theory, this study examined how perceived autonomy-supportive teaching relates to agentic engagement among Chinese university students in English as a foreign language learning context, with positive academic emotions as a potential mediating mechanism. A convenience sample of 566 Chinese non-English majors (458 females, 108 males) was recruited from twelve College English classes at a public university in southwestern China. Participants were first- and second-year students with an average of over ten years of English learning experience, representing mixed proficiency levels typical of compulsory EFL instruction. Cross-sectional survey data were collected and participants reported their perceptions of autonomy-supportive teaching, positive academic emotions (enjoyment, hope, and pride), and agentic engagement. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the hypothesized direct and indirect associations among the study variables. The results indicated that perceived autonomy-supportive teaching was positively associated with agentic engagement. This association was both direct and indirect, operating through positive academic emotions. Enjoyment, hope, and pride jointly mediated a substantial proportion of the total effect, suggesting that positive emotions function as proximal psychological processes linking supportive instructional practices to students’ proactive engagement. The findings demonstrate that autonomy-supportive teaching fosters agentic engagement not only through motivational pathways but also by cultivating emotionally supportive learning environments. By highlighting the mediating role of positive academic emotions, this study advances an integrated motivational–affective account of engagement and provides contextually grounded evidence from Chinese higher education. The results underscore the importance of attending to students’ emotional experiences when promoting learner agency in instructional settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.