ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Fentanyl or Morphine? a qualitative investigation of solo responding paramedics´ decision-making in prehospital care.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSolo responding unit (SRU) paramedics at Oslo University Hospital (OUH) can administer either morphine or fentanyl for prehospital pain management. Although both opioids are available, the choice between them is made by individual clinicians in time-critical situations, often with limited information, variable transport conditions, and minimal organisational feedback. Existing research has primarily focused on comparative efficacy and safety, while less attention has been paid to how paramedics reason in practice. This study explores the clinical, logistical, and organisational factors that influence SRU paramedics' opioid selection, how advantages and disadvantages of morphine and fentanyl are perceived, and how local norms and decision-making support shape practice.
methodsThis qualitative descriptive study employed three face-to-face focus groups with a total of 11 participants. The sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. The first author's dual role as an SRU paramedic was acknowledged and used reflexively to enhance the interpretation of the findings.
resultsThe participants (1 female, 10 male, mean age 42 years, mean 19.6 years of ambulance experience from urban and rural regions within OUH) emphasised the role of personal experience and intuitive judgement in selecting between morphine and fentanyl. Fentanyl was favoured for rapid onset in acute traumatic pain or short transports, while morphine was selected for its longer duration in frail patients or lengthy transports. "Ambulance truths", informal, station-specific beliefs, filled gaps where formal guidance was lacking. Safety concerns existed for both drugs, although severe adverse events were rarely experienced by participants.
conclusionSRU paramedics' opioid selection is shaped by an interplay of pharmacological reasoning, familiarity, organisational protocols, and cultural norms. The findings suggest that formalised training, streamlined documentation, and structured feedback mechanisms may support more consistent decision-making in prehospital analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.