Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981630›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026

Moulage safety practice around the world: a framework for best practice.

Jessica Stokes-Parish, Daniel Bauer, Cecile Fourie, Maritza Harvey, Samantha McCormack, Jyotsna Rimal, David Shablak, Naomi Shiner, Janice Sinoski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica Stokes-ParishFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, Queensland, QLD 4226, Australia. jstokesp@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-8719
Daniel BauerInstitute for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-3327
Cecile FourieUniversity of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-902X
Maritza HarveyClinical Skills Development Service, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1167-8439
Samantha McCormackCollege of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-4550
Jyotsna RimalSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-0325
David ShablakUnited States Air Force-School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, United States of America.
Naomi ShinerFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1051-1106
Janice SinoskiSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Lynchburg, Lynchburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2833-8005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoulage is ubiquitous with simulated participant (SP) practice. Moulage presents a physical and psychological risk to SPs, due to the application of active products, ingredients, and the creation of highly realistic wounds, which could evoke emotional distress or overidentification.

methodsThe Moulage international Virtual Community of Practice convened in 2023 to commence standards of best practice in relation to moulage use with SPs. Using consensus methodology, the 9 authors catalogued their usual practice, reviewed relevant literature and standards to iteratively develop a conceptual framework and checklist.

resultsAs a result, a conceptual framework and checklist were developed for safe moulage practice for pre-simulation, during-simulation, and post-simulation phases. The framework highlights key roles and corporate governance to achieve risk mitigation regardless of the simulation setting. To augment the framework, the authors developed the Moulage Application Safety Checklist, a 17-item tool for moulage in use.

conclusionThe conceptual framework and checklist provide an evidence-informed tool for considering moulage safety with SPs. Safe use of moulage should not be an afterthought.

Identifiers

PMID41981630
PMCPMC13188686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.