Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981616›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2026

Optimizing document retrieval using massive text embeddings and LLM prompt engineering.

Goran Mitrov, Boris Stanoev, Vladimir Trajkovik, Biljana Risteska Stojkoska, Lasko Basnarkov, Petre Lameski, Martin Kampel, Eftim Zdravevski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Goran MitrovFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4501-4743
Boris StanoevFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.
Vladimir TrajkovikFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.
Biljana Risteska StojkoskaFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.
Lasko BasnarkovFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.
Petre LameskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.
Martin KampelComputer Vision Lab, TU Wien, Favoritenstr. 9/193-1, Vienna, 1040, Austria. martin.kampel@tuwien.ac.at.
Eftim ZdravevskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovik 16, Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid expansion of digital data poses a unique challenge for retrieving relevant and insightful information efficiently. In particular, the increasing volume of scientific publications has made literature reviews time-consuming. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers new opportunities to streamline this process.

methodsThis paper explores the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for query reformulation and evaluates the performance of nine massive text embedding models, varying in size and fine-tuning strategies, in the context of document retrieval. We apply multiple prompt engineering techniques to evaluate the ability of LLMs to generate effective queries, comparing them with human-crafted queries. These are used to retrieve documents utilizing nine embedding models. The evaluation is across five datasets using metrics such as recall, average precision, and rank-based measures.

resultsResults show that embedding models fine-tuned for semantic similarity consistently outperform general-purpose models, with UAE Large proving most robust across diverse domains. Furthermore, queries generated using zero-shot and few-shot prompting techniques often surpass the performance of human-formulated queries.

conclusionThese findings highlight the value of integrating LLMs and massive text embeddings to reduce manual effort in literature reviews. GenAI provides a reliable starting point for query formulation, with human input reserved for refinement when needed.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalLarge Language ModelsArtificial IntelligenceGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansSemanticsAutomated surveysDocument retrievalInformation retrievalLLMsMassive text embeddingsPrompt engineeringSystematic review automationVector indexes

Identifiers

PMID41981616
PMCPMC13200469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.