ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a frequent complication of sepsis that significantly impacts clinical outcomes, underscoring the necessity for early identification to facilitate timely intervention. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine-learning model to predict early onset SIC within 3 days.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study, four distinct cohorts derived from the MIMIC-IV dataset, the eICU Collaborative Research Database, and an ICU cohort from Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, were used for model derivation and validation. Core predictive variables were identified through multi-step feature engineering using data collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. Five machine learning models were trained based on these features and subsequently evaluated on three external validation cohorts.
resultsThe derivation cohort, drawn from MIMIC-IV v2.2 database, included 11,033 patients. External validation encompassed three cohorts totaling 5,572 patients: MIMIC-IV v3.1 dataset (n = 1,371), eICU Database (n = 2,848), and Zhongda Hospital database (n = 1,353). Among five evaluated machine learning models, XGBoost demonstrated the best discriminative performance. The final model incorporated seven predictive variables: International Normalized Ratio, lactate, platelet count, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) circulation, renal, and respiratory subscores, and mechanical ventilation status. The model achieved robust prediction of early-stage SIC across validation sets (internal validation set AUC = 0.83; internal test set AUC = 0.82; external validation set AUC = 0.93,0.86,0.83, respectively). However, the model was ineffective for predicting late-onset SIC, with an internal test set AUC of 0.5 and external validation set AUCs of 0.48, 0.53, and 0.6, respectively.
conclusionThis study establishes the feasibility of an interpretable XGBoost model for accurately predicting early-onset SIC. As a promising clinical decision-support tool, its real-world utility and impact on patient outcomes should be further established through prospective validation prior to deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.