ArticleBMC medical education2026
Pick Up Sports and Health (PUSH): a pilot evaluation of a student-led service-learning program for health literacy and professional development in underserved communities.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical education accreditation standards increasingly demand meaningful community engagement opportunities, yet many institutions struggle to establish sustainable student-led service-learning programs. Additionally, health literacy remains low in underserved communities, and medical students’ attitudes toward underserved populations often decline during training.
aimTo conduct a pilot evaluation of PUSH (Pick Up Sports and Health), a student-led service-learning program that combines physical activities with health education for underserved youth, assessing feasibility and early educational outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a pilot study using a mixed methods approach (Fall 2024) involving 25 health profession student volunteers (“Coaches”) and 11 child participants (ages 8–12) from an underserved community in Upper Manhattan. This pilot study employed both quantitative and qualitative data collection including an 11-item non-validated Likert scale survey assessing Coaches’ perceived competency growth across four domains (community understanding, clinical knowledge application, communication skills, and leadership) and qualitative reflections. Child and parent surveys measured self-reported health knowledge retention (assessed four months after initial sessions), interest in healthcare careers, and program satisfaction.
resultsAmong Coaches, 92–96% reported perceived growth in competency across all domains, with 88% expressing willingness to volunteer again. Over 90% of child participants demonstrated improved self-reported health knowledge, and 45.5% expressed interest in pursuing healthcare careers. The program operated at a low cost of $20–50 per session, with minimal faculty time commitment (2–3 h per month). However, these findings are based on small-scale, self-reported data without a comparison group.
conclusionsPUSH appears feasible and demonstrates promising early outcomes as an affordable, student-led service-learning model with preliminary benefits for both health profession students and community members, although findings are based on small-scale, self-reported data. The findings support the need for larger-scale evaluation using validated tools and control groups before broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.