ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Challenges faced by nurses and their stress of conscience levels in providing palliative care: a cross-sectional descriptive study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo reveal the challenges faced by nurses providing palliative care to hospitalized patients and to determine their levels of stress of conscience while delivering palliative care.
methodIn this cross-sectional and descriptive study, a total of 143 nurses providing palliative care in the intensive care and oncology units of a university hospital were included in the study. The Nurses Descriptive Characteristics Form, Palliative Care Difficulties Scale and Stress of Conscience Questionnaire were used to collect the data. In the analysis of the data, arithmetic mean, Cronbach’s alpha, Independent Samples t-test, Analysis of Variance test, Mann Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman’s Correlation were used.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 31.26 ± 6.88 years. While 25.9% of them defined the concept of conscience as “compassion”, 21.0% defined it as “empathy”. The mean scores they obtained from the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire and the Palliative Care Difficulties Scale were 86.8 ± 48.7 and 42.6 ± 8.3, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship between the scores they obtained from the overall the Palliative Care Difficulties Scale and the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (p > 0.05). The relationship between the participants’ the Palliative Care Difficulties Scale scores and the variables such as sex, and the department they work in was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).
conclusionThe results of this study revealed that nurses providing palliative care should be supported, and that being female and having a postgraduate education positively affected conscience. It may be recommended to focus on ethical issues related to palliative care in undergraduate and graduate education. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses providing palliative care in areas such as intensive care and oncology encounter numerous ethical issues and experience moral distress while maintaining effective communication with their patients and ensuring continuity of care. Supporting these nurses through national and international policies will positively impact the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.