Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981551›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

The usual and preferred sources of healthcare for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: a multilevel analysis.

Feleke Hailemichael Astawesegn, Subash Thapa, Setognal B Aychiluhm, Phil Naden, Zekariyas S Nezenega, Cheru T Leshargie, Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Kedir Y Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feleke Hailemichael AstawesegnRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia. felekeh86@gmail.com.
Subash ThapaRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Setognal B AychiluhmRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Phil NadenCoonamble Aboriginal Health Service, Coonamble, NSW, Australia.
Zekariyas S NezenegaRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Cheru T LeshargieRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Zemenu Yohannes KassaRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Kedir Y AhmedRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians (hereafter referred to as Indigenous Australians) remains a national priority. While many mainstream services are already in place, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs, hereafter referred to as Aboriginal Medical Services [AMSs]) are primarily established to provide Indigenous Australians with culturally safe, trusted, affordable, and holistic care that mainstream services often cannot offer. This study examines whether Aboriginal Medical Services/Community Centres (AMS/CC) are the usual and preferred sources of healthcare for Indigenous Australians and identifies the factors influencing these choices.

methodsThis study used data from the 2018–19 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (NATSIHS). We analysed responses from 4,416 Indigenous adults (usual source of care) and 4,712 adults (preferred source of care). Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine the association between individual and contextual factors with the choice of Aboriginal Medical Services/Community Controlled Health Services (AMS/ACCHS) as the usual and preferred sources of healthcare.

resultsOur findings showed that most Indigenous Australians usually visited a mainstream GP (53%) more often than an AMS/CC (34%), while a higher proportion preferred AMS/CC (47%) over mainstream GPs (43%). The use of and preference for AMS/CC were higher among those experiencing financial stress (use: aOR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.71–2.96; preference: aOR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.30–1.97), those satisfied with their access to cultural knowledge (use: aOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.38–2.61; preference: aOR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11–1.76), and individuals with a history of being removed from their natural family (use: aOR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.33–2.52; preference: aOR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.32–2.18). Experiencing discrimination in the past 12 months also increased the likelihood of using (aOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.20–2.13) or preferring (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.35–2.08) AMS/CC. Furthermore, Indigenous Australians living in inner or outer regional areas, very remote areas, and the Northern Territory were more likely to use or prefer AMS/CC. Conversely, those residing in less disadvantaged areas were less likely to use AMS/CC services than those in the most disadvantaged areas.

conclusionsSince most Indigenous Australians still use mainstream GPs, this probably reflects issues with availability and access, as AMSs are not accessible everywhere, leaving people with little option other than to see a GP. The findings highlight the need to expand AMSs, especially in rural and regional areas, and to tailor mainstream healthcare to ensure services are culturally appropriate, respectful, and aligned with the values and preferences of Indigenous communities.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousPatient PreferenceAccess to Primary CareAdolescentAdultAustralasian PeopleAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisYoung AdultAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesAustraliaSources of healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41981551
PMCPMC13202854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.