ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Temperature-dependent variation in gestational diabetes diagnosis and its impact on macrosomia and LGA infant.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the influence of temperature on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been extensively researched, it remains debatable whether this influence stems from a temporary alteration in blood glucose levels due to temperature adaptation or represents a genuine effect on the intrauterine environment. This study aimed to explore the impact of ambient temperature on the diagnosis accuracy of GDM by analyzing pregnancy outcomes among GDM pregnancies diagnosed at different temperatures.
methodsThis cohort study included 65,908 singleton pregnant women who delivered at the Guangdong Women and Children Hospital between January 2015 and June 2022. Participants were categorized based on the 24-hour and morning (8:00–11:00 AM) average ambient temperatures recorded on their oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) day, using the 5th and 95th percentiles as cut-offs, defining low, moderate, and high temperature groups, respectively. We compared the prevalence of GDM and the subsequent risk of macrosomia or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants across these groups. Risk ratios (RRs) for macrosomia and LGA infants in GDM pregnancies diagnosed at low or moderate temperatures, relative to high temperatures were quantified using modified Poisson regression.
resultsAmong the 65,908 pregnant women, the prevalence of GDM varied by ambient temperature. When stratified by the 24-hour average temperature, the prevalence was highest in the high-temperature group (20.0%), followed by the moderate- (18.2%) and low-temperature (16.4%) groups. A similar gradient was observed for the morning average temperature, with prevalence rates of 20.2%, 18.3%, and 15.8% in the high-, moderate-, and low-temperature groups, respectively. Compared with GDM pregnancies diagnosed at high 24-hour average temperatures, those diagnosed at low temperatures were more likely to develop an LGA infant (10.2% vs. 6.3%; adjusted RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.18) and macrosomia (4.6% vs. 2.2%; adjusted RR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.01, 3.59). A consistent pattern was observed when using the morning average temperature for stratification.
conclusionsWhile GDM prevalence rose with increasing ambient temperature on the OGTT day, the rates of subsequent LGA infants and macrosomia among GDM pregnancies fell. The divergent patterns between diagnosis rates and neonatal outcomes suggest that temperature may influence glycemic measurements and diagnostic classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.