ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Barriers to and facilitators of deprescribing for older people in secondary care in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study using a theory-based approach.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Deprescribing Curricular Exposure, Attitudes, and Preparedness Among Undergraduate Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Saudi Arabia, over 55% of older people are exposed to potentially inappropriate medications. Deprescribing, a structured process to identify and discontinue unnecessary or harmful medications under medical supervision, by healthcare professionals (physicians and pharmacists) remains limited. Understanding barriers to and facilitators of deprescribing for older people from the perspectives of these healthcare professionals is essential for developing effective hospital-based deprescribing interventions.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians and pharmacists working in hospitals in southern Saudi Arabia, recruited through purposive sampling. Eligible participants were physicians who worked with older inpatients and pharmacists with a ward-based role who had input into prescribing decisions. Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF2)-based interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was first performed to generate themes from the data. Themes representing barriers and facilitators were then deductively mapped to TDF2 domains to prioritise domains and identify relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs).
resultsTwenty physicians and 20 pharmacists were interviewed. Six prioritised TDF2 domains represented determinants for deprescribing: Social/professional role and identity, Social influences, Environmental context and resources, Knowledge, Behavioural regulation, and Beliefs about consequences. Key barriers included pharmacists’ limited role, clinicians’ perceptions of negative patient and carer attitudes toward deprescribing, concerns about negative outcomes, lack of guidelines and documentation, and resource constraints. Facilitators included inter-professional support, clinician education, and recognition of deprescribing benefits. Forty BCTs were identified for inclusion in a deprescribing intervention.
conclusionThis study provides a foundation for designing a theory-informed intervention to enable deprescribing in Saudi hospital settings. It highlights context-specific influences, including the need to enhance coordination across care levels and improve systemic supports for deprescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.