Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981445›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

Changes of medicinal food plant uses in the Gaoligongshan biocultural diversity center, China.

Zhuo Cheng, Xiangxiang Lou, Ren-Ai Xu, Fangfang Xia, Chunlin Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhuo ChengCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xiangxiang LouCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Ren-Ai XuCollege of Hortuculture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Hubei, 434023, China. ysxurenai@hotmail.com.
Fangfang XiaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 325000, China. helenxia4271@163.com.
Chunlin LongCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China. long@mail.kib.ac.cn.

Funding

Baoshan Administration of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve GBP-2022-01 and 202305AF150121Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs 2025QT015National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370407 and W2523057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Gaoligongshan area, located in western Yunnan, China, is the richest biocultural diversity hotspot with unique geological history and ecological environment. Local people such as the Lisu, Nu, Dulong and Han have developed rich traditional knowledge systems associated with medicinal food plants (MFPs). These MFPs play a vital role in local communities by contributing to health, the economy, and cultural heritage. However, MFPs are at risk of disappearing, and there is a lack of comprehensive and systematic studies on their earlier transformation and current use in Gaoligongshan area. This study synthesizes earlier literature and recent market data to reveal specific shifts in MFP use and practices in this hotspot.

methodsEthnobotanical methods, including literature reviews and market surveys were employed to collect information on MFPs used by different linguistic groups in the Gaoligongshan area across two periods, the earlier time and a recent market-survey stage. Information was recorded on plant families, medicinal parts, processing methods, and medicinal efficacy. Comparisons were made between earlier and current data to evaluate the adaptation and transformation of traditional knowledge associated with MFPs.

results117 MFPs (56 families) were documented in the earlier stage and 178 MFPs (89 families) were documented in the current period. The used parts shifted from roots being dominant in the earlier time (43.59%) to fruits being most commonly used in the recent period (22.47%), with roots decreasing to 8.43%. Processing methods also changed, with stir-frying increasing (from 36.75% to 48.31%) and boiling decreasing (from 34.19% to 25.84%). The findings suggest continuity and adaptation in the selection of MFPs by local people, highlighting the dynamic interaction between cultural practices and environmental changes. The research identified 39 MFPs consistently used over time, reflecting their ongoing cultural and medicinal importance, and compiled an MFP resource pool of 244 candidate species that were not recorded in either the earlier or current datasets, indicating opportunities for future exploration and sustainable development.

conclusionThis study documents cross-period changes and continuity in medicinal food plants and provides descriptive evidence relevant to ethnobotany and the food-medicine continuum. We highlight three key insights: a relative decrease in root use and increase in fruit use across periods, the persistence of 39 core species, and the compilation of a regional MFP resource pool that may inform future verification. Developing sustainable utilization and conservation strategies is important for preserving biodiversity and traditional culture in the Gaoligongshan area.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEthnobotanyMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPlants, EdiblePlants, MedicinalChinaHumansKnowledgeBiodiversityEthnobotanyMedicinal plantsTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID41981445
PMCPMC13188484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.