ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Research progress of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee from perspective of precision medicine].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric and visualization analysis of dynamic gap equilibration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically summarize the application and research progress of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the treatment of valgus knee from the perspective of precision medicine in recent years, so as to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of valgus knee. Methods: Relevant domestic and foreign literature, including clinical studies and evidence-based evaluations regarding robot-assisted TKA versus conventional TKA for valgus knee, was reviewed. A systematic analysis was performed focusing on technical advantages, efficacy differences and existing controversies. Results: Conventional TKA is limited by surgeons' experiences, leading to insufficient accuracy in alignment correction, great challenges in soft tissue balance, and postoperative residual deformity. Robot-assisted TKA is significantly superior to conventional approaches in terms of alignment correction accuracy, joint function improvement, and reduction of postoperative complication rates, with confirmed short-term effectiveness. Nevertheless, controversies remain concerning the limitations of robot applicability, prolonged operation time and uncertain long-term effectiveness. Conclusion: Robot-assisted TKA provides a precision-oriented therapeutic option for valgus knee with remarkable short-term effectiveness. Further large-sample studies with long-term follow-up are still required to verify its efficacy and facilitate its clinical popularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.