ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Zeta-focal bone lengthening for bone defects after fracture-related infection: a two-case based research].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the clinical experiences of using Zeta-focal bone lengthening to treat bone defects caused by fracture-related infection (FRI) in two cases, and to preliminarily explore its feasibility and efficacy. Methods: In 2023, two male patients with bone defects caused by FRI were treated, aged 19 and 40 years, respectively. After admission, stage Ⅰ treatment consisted of thorough debridement and infection control based on bacterial culture and drug susceptibility test results. The lengths of bone defects were 6 cm and 22 cm, respectively. When the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and inflammatory markers returned to normal ranges, stage Ⅱ treatment (debridement and reconstruction with Zeta-focal bone lengthening) was performed. Distraction was initiated at 7 days after the second-stage operation. Docking of the bone segments was achieved at 11 and 40 days of distraction, respectively, and obvious mineralization in the distraction zones was observed at 65 and 104 days postoperatively. The external fixator was removed after radiographic evidence of cortical continuity at four sites was confirmed on anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films. The external fixation time was 112 and 357 days, respectively, and the external fixation indexes were 18.5 and 17.9 days/cm, respectively. Complications during the distraction period were observed. During follow-up, bone healing and functional recovery were evaluated with the Paley D score, the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Results: Both patients completed the two-stage treatment. Their hospital stays were 21 and 16 days, respectively. Only mild pin-tract reactions occurred during the distraction period. Both patients were followed up for 18 months. At last follow-up, 2 patients achieved excellent functional results according to the ASAMI score, and bone healing was rated as excellent by the Paley D score. In 1 patient, the LEFS score was 76 and the AOFAS score was 95. The other patient was not scored because of knee arthrodesis. Conclusion: Under the prerequisites of strict infection control and individualized segmental design, Zeta-focal bone lengthening can achieve effective reconstruction of infectious bone defects and significantly reduce the external fixation time and the external fixation index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.