ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Analysis of risk factors for postoperative loss of reduction in unstable distal radius fractures and development of a nomogram prediction model].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in distal radius fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the risk factors for postoperative loss of reduction in unstable distal radius fractures and to develop a predictive model, providing clinicians with a more precise risk assessment tool to support the formulation of individualized treatment plans. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 209 patients with unstable distal radius fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and December 2023. There were 97 males and 112 females, aged 44-81 years with a mean age of 57.1 years. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative loss of reduction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to screen risk factors and construct a nomogram prediction model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was applied to assess model fit, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive performance. Additionally, decision curve analysis was employed to assess the clinical utility of the model. Results: At 6 months after operation, radiographic evaluation showed loss of reduction in 68 cases. Univariate analysis identified the following as influencing factors for postoperative loss of reduction ( Conclusion: Older age, AO/OTA type C fractures, fracture displacement, dorsal metaphyseal comminuted fracture, prolonged operation time, low preoperative serum calcium level, and comorbid osteoporosis are the main risk factors for postoperative loss of reduction in patients with unstable distal radius fractures. The established predictive nomogram model enables clinicians to more accurately assess the risk of postoperative loss of reduction and provides valuable support for personalized treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.