Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981427›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026

[Posterior open approach combined with suture bridge technique for tibial insertion avulsion fractures of posterior cruciate ligament].

Bowen Zhu, Weijun Wang, Minghao Zhang, Qing Jiang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bowen ZhuDivision of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China.
Weijun WangDivision of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China.
Minghao ZhangDivision of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China.
Qing JiangDivision of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and technical points of posterior open approach combined with suture bridge technique for the treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 21 patients with PCL tibial insertion avulsion fractures who underwent posterior open approach combined with suture bridge technique between July 2023 and July 2025. There were 14 males and 7 females, aged 11-68 years (mean, 48.3 years). Fracture displacement ranged from 3.9 to 13.7 mm, with an average of 7.9 mm. Preoperative Lysholm score was 46.1±3.9, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score was 44.8±4.1, and posterior knee laxity was (4.1±0.5) mm. The time from injury to surgery ranged from 1 to 30 days, with an average of 9.4 days. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Knee function was assessed using Lysholm score and IKDC subjective score. Posterior knee laxity was measured bilaterally using a KT-2000 arthrometer, and the results were expressed as the side-to-side difference. Results: All surgeries were successfully completed. The operation time ranged from 40 to 130 minutes (mean, 80.2 minutes), and intraoperative blood loss ranged from 7 to 20 mL (mean, 10.4 mL). All incisions healed by first intention without early complication such as surgery-related infection or neurovascular injury. All 21 patients were followed up 12-20 months, with a mean of 18.3 months. Radiographic examination showed anatomical reduction and bony union in all fractures, with healing time ranging from 8 to 14 weeks (mean, 11.5 weeks). During follow-up, no reduction loss, implant loosening or breakage was observed. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score was 90.3±3.1, IKDC subjective score was 91.0±3.1, and posterior knee laxity was (1.6±0.4) mm, all showing significant differences compared with preoperative values ( Conclusion: The posterior open approach combined with suture bridge technique for PCL tibial insertion avulsion fractures offers the dual advantages of reliable reduction under direct vision and robust fixation with suture bridge, demonstrating safety and efficacy. It is particularly suitable for complex cases such as comminuted fractures, old fractures, or those complicated by posterior neurovascular injury.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, AvulsionKnee FracturesPosterior Cruciate LigamentSuture TechniquesTibial FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointMaleMiddle Agedinternal fixationopen surgeryPosterior cruciate ligamentsuture bridge techniquetibial insertion avulsion fracture

Identifiers

PMID41981427
PMCPMC13096842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.