ArticleInternational journal of dental hygiene2026
Awareness and Usage of Water Irrigation Devices Among Implant Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of dental hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental implants are a preferred treatment option for partially or completely edentulous patients. However, they come with challenges, such as peri-implant diseases requiring effective maintenance, including water irrigation devices (WID).
objectivesThis study investigated awareness and usage patterns of WID among patients with dental implants or planning to receive them.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 211 patients visiting the implant clinic of King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital in Jeddah (KAUDH), Saudi Arabia. A structured questionnaire covering demographic data, dental implant history, and WID usage patterns was administered.
resultsMost participants were female (75.4%) and of Saudi nationality (88.6%). While 73% were aware of WID, only 34.1% used them. Of the users, 51.4% chose these devices for a sense of cleanliness, 41.7% for their convenience, and 45.8% followed their doctor's recommendation. Non-Saudi participants were less likely (12.5%) to use WID compared to Saudis (36.9%) (p = 0.0021). While not reaching statistical significance, income levels appeared to affect usage, with a greater likelihood of usage among higher earners.
conclusionThis study reveals a discrepancy between awareness and actual use of water irrigation devices among dental implant patients. This underscores the need for enhanced patient education and professional guidance in water irrigation device usage for dental implant care. Future research should focus on patient perceptions and compare them with clinical outcomes for evidence-based dental practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.