ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026
Political economy of adolescent mental health and well-being globally.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current generation of 1.3 billion adolescents (10-19-year-olds), most of whom live in low- and middle-income countries, face large and growing mental health problems. Collective action that could lead to significant improvement in adolescent mental health and well-being (AMH) remains limited. We analyse the factors shaping the global prioritization of AMH for funding and action and reflect on a way forward.
methodsWe triangulate data from interviews with key informants knowledgeable in AMH; focus group discussions with youth representatives who are mental health advocates, some with lived experience of mental ill-health; and document review. We collected the qualitative data from 2021 to 2023, followed by thematic analysis and stakeholder consultations.
resultsWe identify four themes which shape the global prioritization of AMH. First, prevailing interpersonal and institutional stigma and discrimination directed against adolescents with mental health problems hamper attention to AMH. Second, limited data on the burden of mental health problems and evidence of what works have led to the perception among decision-makers that AMH is an intractable problem. Third, diverse ways of framing AMH are often viewed as a sign of weak alignment rather than as opportunities for coalition-building. Fourth, a wide variety and increasing number of stakeholders are involved in AMH, while the stakeholder landscape remains fragmented, inhibiting coalition-building for AMH.
conclusionsTo overcome the barriers that currently impede the prioritization of AMH, we recommend that (1) stakeholders conduct an adolescent-led consultative process to develop an "umbrella framing", supported by common metrics, (2) advocates use existing global platforms to shape the political priority for AMH, (3) decision-makers, funders and research partners invest in meaningful engagement of adolescents (with lived experience), researchers and implementing partners (4) identify a leadership, governance and accountability structure for a global coalition that could transform AMH and (5) conduct context-specific analyses to inform coalition-building nationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.