ArticleBMC medical education2026
Developing a competency framework for medical laboratory scientists in Taiwan: a modified Delphi approach.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical Laboratory Scientists (MLS) are essential members of the healthcare team, providing critical information for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and disease prevention. With rapid advances in laboratory medicine, the scope of MLS practice has expanded, increasing the need for clearly defined competency expectations. Although competency frameworks have been developed in several countries, Taiwan currently lacks a comprehensive framework that is both internationally informed and contextually relevant to local healthcare practice.
methodsThis study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023, employing a multi-stage mixed-methods approach to develop a competency framework for MLS in Taiwan. A structured literature review and expert focus group discussions were first undertaken to identify preliminary competency domains. A three-round modified Delphi survey involving 39 experts from teaching hospitals across different regions of Taiwan was subsequently conducted to achieve consensus. Iterative modifications were made between each round to refine competency indicators, and the final consensus rate was set at 75%.
resultsThe final framework comprises five core competencies—Technical Skills, Knowledge Base, Communication, Continuous Professional Development, and Professionalism—and 15 associated sub-competencies. Notably, three competency domain-level revisions were made during the Delphi process to reflect more observable and assessable behaviors. Additionally, six sub-competencies were revised for clarity and alignment with professional practice.
conclusionThis study successfully constructed a comprehensive and hierarchically structured competency framework for MLS in Taiwan. The framework is both internationally aligned and deeply localized, providing a robust foundation for curriculum development and competency-based assessments. This framework is expected to significantly support the ongoing modernization of MLS education and enhance the quality of laboratory services in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.