ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Factors influencing home dialysis choice in Scandinavia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHome dialysis provides several advantages over in-center hemodialysis, yet its uptake remains limited. Understanding how patients and kidney professionals perceive home dialysis is key to improving access and support. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the choice of home dialysis and to examine potential differences in perceptions between patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals across countries.
methodsA cross-sectional study using mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A digital survey, developed through eight workshops (2021–2023) with patients and kidney professionals, included both closed- and open-ended questions. The survey was distributed to patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals in Scandinavia. Quantitative data were analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for gender, age, and country, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis.
resultsThe survey received responses from 269 patients and 185 professionals. Patients were predominantly male (57.3%, mean age 61.3), while professionals were mainly female (85.6%, mean age 49.4). Prior patient experience included PD in 179 (35.8%) and HHD in 66 (13.2%). Independence was identified as the top reason for choosing home dialysis, though many found the decision challenging. Patients cited barriers such as unclear reimbursement (OR = 0.29), limited technology (OR = 0.44), and poor communication tools (OR = 0.18). Professionals highlighted patient reluctance (OR = 7.29), relative involvement (OR = 7.54), social isolation (OR = 7.18), and unsuitable home environments (OR = 3.64). Qualitative responses highlighted the complexity of modality choice and illustrated differing perspectives between patients and professionals.
conclusionsPatients and professionals perceive distinct barriers to home dialysis. Tailored interventions addressing these differences are essential to improve the uptake of home dialysis in Scandinavia.
trial registrationNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.