Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41981380›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Intuition criticizes self, analysis protects mother: evidence from an ERPs study.

Fan He, Yangzhuo Li, Yao Wang, Junlong Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fan HeSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.
Yangzhuo LiSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China. liyz@shnu.edu.cn.
Yao WangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.
Junlong LuoSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China. luo831023@shnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-4616

Funding

Yangzhuo Li China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M75272)Yangzhuo Li National Natural Science Foundation of China (3240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In collectivistic cultures, individuals' self-concept is deeply intertwined with perceptions of their mother. However, evaluation biases towards both the self and the mother, as well as the underlying cognitive mechanisms, remain unclear. This study explored self-mother evaluation biases under intuitive processing, extending prior research on analytical processing. Using the Remember/Know self-reference paradigm and event-related potentials (ERPs) technology, we manipulated response time and cognitive load to dissociate intuitive from analytical processing. Results showed that, under analytical processing conditions, maternal negative trait words elicited a stronger N400 component, indicating a positive bias in the evaluation of mothers, while self-negative trait words evoked a stronger LPP component, reflecting a negative processing bias toward self-related traits. Under intuitive processing conditions, individuals showed no evaluative bias toward their mothers, whereas self-positive trait words triggered enhanced N200 and N400 components, demonstrating a negative bias in self-evaluation. The modesty effect may explain the negative bias in self-evaluation during intuitive processing. The tendency to defend mothers' evaluations may be attributable to the emotional bond formed through long-term maternal parenting in collectivistic cultures.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsIntuitionMothersSelf ConceptAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultEvaluation biasesEvent-related potentialsIntuitive processingMotherSelf

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.