ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Intuition criticizes self, analysis protects mother: evidence from an ERPs study.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In collectivistic cultures, individuals' self-concept is deeply intertwined with perceptions of their mother. However, evaluation biases towards both the self and the mother, as well as the underlying cognitive mechanisms, remain unclear. This study explored self-mother evaluation biases under intuitive processing, extending prior research on analytical processing. Using the Remember/Know self-reference paradigm and event-related potentials (ERPs) technology, we manipulated response time and cognitive load to dissociate intuitive from analytical processing. Results showed that, under analytical processing conditions, maternal negative trait words elicited a stronger N400 component, indicating a positive bias in the evaluation of mothers, while self-negative trait words evoked a stronger LPP component, reflecting a negative processing bias toward self-related traits. Under intuitive processing conditions, individuals showed no evaluative bias toward their mothers, whereas self-positive trait words triggered enhanced N200 and N400 components, demonstrating a negative bias in self-evaluation. The modesty effect may explain the negative bias in self-evaluation during intuitive processing. The tendency to defend mothers' evaluations may be attributable to the emotional bond formed through long-term maternal parenting in collectivistic cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41981380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.