SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Focused and unfocused transcranial ultrasound stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a non-invasive method that allows deep brain structures to be targeted, and it may benefit individuals with Alzheimer'sdisease (AD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of TUS on global cognitive function in mild-to-moderate AD, comparing focused transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) with unfocused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS).
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TUS with sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the change in global cognitive function. Secondary outcomes included functional status,depressive symptoms, and safety.
resultsThree RCTs (N=84) were included. Pooled analysis showed that TUS did not significantly improve global cognition compared with sham (SMD=0.31, p=0.54). However,subgroup analysis showed a significant difference between modalities (p=0.047):unfocused LIPUS had a larger effect size (SMD=0.73) than focused TPS (SMD=0.17).Notably, significant cognitive improvement was observed in patients <70 years. Active treatment showed higher disease stabilization rates ("responders"), reduced depressive symptoms (specifically TPS, p=0.008), and improved cerebral perfusion without amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA).
conclusionWhile pooled analyses did not show a global cognitive benefit, the results favoured unfocused LIPUS over focused TPS; TUS had an excellent safety profile and higher disease stabilization rates; the potential benefits in younger populations and the biological effects suggest that TUS is a promising adjunct that should be further optimized for stimulation. REGISTRATION: This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251276660).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41981348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.