ArticleMicrobial ecology2026
Differential Modulation of Wheat Transcriptional Programs Driven by Native Endophytic Fungi.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungal endophytes are increasingly recognised as key modulators of plant physiology, however their molecular impact on major crops such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) remains underexplored. In this study, we analyzed the transcriptomic response of wheat seedlings to treatment with native endophytic fungi representing four species: Penicillium olsonii, Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium, Sarocladium spinificis, and Sarocladium strictum. Using high-resolution RNA-sequencing, we reveal that each endophyte induces a distinct transcriptional landscape in wheat seedlings grown under controlled conditions, reflecting divergent modes of host interaction. Penicillium olsonii and C. pseudomerdarium induced broad transcriptional reprogramming, characterised by repression of chromatin organisation and DNA replication pathways, coupled with selective activation of signalling and metabolic functions—suggesting a state of physiological priming or resource reallocation. Sarocladium spinificis triggered a moderate, predominantly upregulatory response involving circadian rhythm, ABA signalling, and stress-associated pathways, consistent with developmental modulation rather than immune activation. In contrast, S. strictum elicited a negligible transcriptional response, downregulating only a single pathway linked to diterpenoid biosynthesis. This silent interaction may reflect a commensal, latent, or stress-contingent role. Our findings highlight the plasticity of plant-endophyte communication and provide ecological insight into species-specific modes of interaction, with potential exploitation for sustainable agriculture. Understanding these subtle and species-specific responses offers a foundation for harnessing endogenous fungal microbiota in crop resilience strategies, particularly under climate-related stress scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.