ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026
Characterization of rare genomic structural variants across 2,981 genomes reveals significant involvements in recessive conditions.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal-Onset Recessive Titinopathies: Clinical Spectrum, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) underlie genomic diversity and human diseases; however, current short-read sequencing-based methods experience challenges in precisely identifying and determining SV composition, which often lead to incorrect interpretation and/or missing detection of clinically significant variants. Here, we introduce SCARD (split-read, chimeric read-pairs, and read-depth difference), an integrated approach optimized for the detection and characterization of rare SVs using short-read genome sequencing data. Firstly, we evaluated rare SV (with minor allele frequency <1%) detection performance using 16 clinical cases with 18 previously ascertained exonic deletions/duplications in dominant/recessive conditions. SCARD accurately detected all 18 exonic deletions/duplications, ranging from 490 bp to 24.5 kb, confirmed by gap-PCR and/or Sanger sequencing, outperforming other methods that only achieved 15/18 at best. In addition, SCARD characterized rare SVs from 2,504 unrelated individuals and 477 trios/probands from the 1000 Genomes Project, and compared them to those from 13 SV detection methods (13callers). Among the 2,504 genomes analyzed, we identified 429,259 rare simple deletions/duplications and 7,795 structural rearrangements, with 10.7% of deletions/duplications (46,032/429,259) and 40.1% of structural rearrangements (3,126/7,795) being novel to those from the 13callers. Notably, 45.2% (1,133/2,504) of the subjects carried likely loss-of-function SVs involving autosomal recessive disorders related genes. In 477 trios, the overall de novo rate for rare SVs was 0.5% (383/77,349). Finally, to evaluate the accuracy of rare SV calling, we compared our SVs in 15 cases to those of high-quality long-read sequencing datasets. The accuracies of detecting deletions/duplications, structural rearrangements, and all SVs by SCARD were 98.0% (2,858/2,917), 94% (47/50), and 97.9% (2,905/2,967), respectively. In comparison, 13callers missed or misinterpreted 325 of 2,905 validated rare SVs (11.2%) reported by SCARD. Overall, our study demonstrates that SCARD enables comprehensive, genome-wide identification and precise delineation of rare SVs, particularly for those affecting exons, to reveal a high carrier rate of autosomal recessive disorders contributed by rare SVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41981265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.