ReviewEye (London, England)2026
Timing of macular hole surgery among vitreoretinal surgeons in the UK: A national survey, review of literature and future direction.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To survey current practice and opinion regarding the timing of idiopathic full thickness macular hole (iFTMH) surgery among consultant vitreoretinal surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK), and to provide an overview of the current literature and future direction. An online survey was sent to all members of the British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons (BEAVRS). Literature search and analysis were conducted on studies that investigated the timing of vitrectomy surgery for iFTMH. A total of 33 responses was received from all regions of the UK except Northern Ireland. The timing from the onset of symptoms to the first vitreoretinal clinic appointment ranged from 1 to 60 months, with a mean of 6.66 ± 10.8 months (95% CI 2.75-10.6). In terms of surgical prioritisation on the listing form, 42.4% (n = 14) were listed as P2 (less than 1 month), 54.5% (n = 18) were listed as P3 (less than 3 months), and 3.03% (n = 1) were listed as P4 (more than 3 months). The average time from the onset of symptoms to operation date in this cohort was 9.87 months. When asked in an ideal world, would they have liked the surgery to be done sooner, the majority (72.7%, n = 24) said 'yes'. The survey found that there were regional variations in waiting times and surgical prioritisation. Expanding teleophthalmology and establishing elective vitreoretinal surgical hubs are crucial for ensuring timely access to care for all iFTMH patients in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.