ArticleScientific reports2026
Utilizing deep learning from mobile phone photos for early detection of horizontal strabismus: a screening approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate an artificial intelligence pipeline for binary screening of horizontal strabismus versus orthotropia using smartphone-acquired facial images and geometric landmark analysis. This two-stage system combines Real-Time Detection Transformer (RT-DETR) to localize nine ocular landmarks per eye across three gaze directions (left, center, right), and supervised machine learning classifiers. A feature set of five biometric ratios was derived from coordinates including the canthi, limbi, and corneal light reflexes. The model was trained on facial images from 150 participants (96 with strabismus and 54 controls). To address class imbalance and improve generalizability, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and 4-fold cross-validation were applied. RT-DETR achieved an intersection over union of 0.62 and a mean center-point error of 6.52 pixels in landmark localization. The Random Forest classifier achieved an accuracy of 0.95, sensitivity of 0.96, specificity of 0.94, positive predictive value of 0.97, and negative predictive value of 0.92. This study demonstrates the feasibility of combining transformer-based landmark detection with geometric ratios for strabismus screening. The framework shows high performance under controlled conditions. While the use of biometric ratios allows for feature-level inspection, further research is required to establish full clinical interpretability and performance in uncontrolled environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.